
SR&ED vs. IRAP – What is the Difference?
Canada’s innovation economy is powered by a range of government programs designed to support research and development, with the Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) and the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax credit standing out as the two most significant sources of federal R&D funding. Canada’s innovation economy is powered by a range of government programs designed to support research and development, with the Industrial Research Assistance Program (IRAP) and the Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) tax credit standing out as the two most significant sources of federal R&D funding. For Canadian businesses, especially startups and SMEs, understanding the differences between these programs-and how to leverage them together-can be the key to unlocking substantial non-dilutive capital and accelerating innovation.
IRAP, managed by the National Research Council of Canada, is a proactive grant program that offers upfront funding and advisory support to small and medium-sized enterprises with fewer than 500 employees. The focus of IRAP is squarely on the commercialization of innovative products, services, or processes. To access IRAP funding, companies must develop a comprehensive business plan that demonstrates not only the technical merit of their project but also its market potential and anticipated economic impact. This plan is submitted to an Industrial Technology Advisor (ITA), who evaluates the project’s feasibility and alignment with both the company’s growth strategy and broader Canadian innovation objectives. If approved, IRAP typically covers between 50% and 80% of eligible salary and subcontractor costs, with funds disbursed in monthly or quarterly installments as work progresses. This immediate cash flow is crucial for startups and growing companies that need to move quickly from concept to commercialization. Beyond funding, IRAP also provides invaluable advisory services, connecting companies with technical expertise, market intelligence, and potential collaborators to maximize their chances of success.
SR&ED, by contrast, is a retrospective tax credit program administered by the Canada Revenue Agency. It is the largest R&D incentive in Canada, providing about $4 to $5 billion annually in tax credits to businesses of all sizes that undertake eligible R&D activities. Unlike IRAP, SR&ED does not require a project to be commercially successful or even reach the market. The core criterion is that the work advances scientific or technological knowledge, addresses technical uncertainty, and is conducted through systematic investigation. Eligible expenses include salaries, subcontractor fees, and materials, and for Canadian-controlled private corporations, the credits are refundable, meaning they can result in a direct cash refund even if the company is not profitable. Claims are filed after the R&D work is completed as part of the company’s tax return, and refunds are typically received within three to six months. There is no cap on the amount a company can claim, and the program is available year-round, making it a reliable source of funding for ongoing innovation.
The differences between IRAP and SR&ED are significant and understanding them is critical for effective funding strategy. IRAP is a highly competitive grant with a limited annual budget, requiring a strong business case and a focus on commercialization. Funding is provided upfront, enabling companies to start projects with the confidence that they have the resources to see them through. SR&ED, on the other hand, is an entitlement program-if your company conducts eligible R&D and files a proper claim, you are legally entitled to the credit. The funding is retroactive, meaning it can help replenish cash flow after the fact, but it does not provide the same immediate support as IRAP.
It is possible-and often highly advantageous-for companies to leverage both IRAP and SR&ED. Many businesses mistakenly believe that receiving IRAP funding disqualifies them from SR&ED, but in reality, the two programs can be combined to maximize total funding. However, careful cost allocation is required to avoid double-dipping, as expenses covered by IRAP cannot be claimed again under SR&ED. Strategic use of both programs can dramatically reduce the net cost of R&D, as illustrated by real-world cases where companies have secured hundreds of thousands of dollars in combined support, fueling rapid growth and innovation.
Regardless of which program you pursue, meticulous documentation is essential. Both IRAP and SR&ED require contemporaneous records that demonstrate the work performed, the rationale for decisions, and the results obtained. This is not just an accounting exercise but a critical part of substantiating your claims and ensuring compliance with program requirements.
For Canadian startups and innovators, the stakes are high and the competition for funding is fierce. Every dollar of non-dilutive capital can make the difference between a breakthrough and a missed opportunity. That’s why it’s absolutely critical to pursue every available avenue-whether proactive grants like IRAP, retroactive credits like SR&ED, or both. If you want to ensure your company is maximizing its innovation funding and not leaving money on the table, reach out to Fundomation today. Our experts can guide you through the complexities of both programs, help you build a winning application, and make sure you claim every dollar you’re entitled to. Don’t let confusion or missed deadlines hold your business back – Contact Fundomation today and let us help you fuel your next big breakthrough.